Regenerative Agriculture: Promise vs Reality

Part 1 of Huntley Sustainability's Agriculture and Sustainability series.

What exactly is regenerative agriculture?

Regenerative agriculture is a farming system that goes beyond sustainability by actively restoring ecosystems. It focuses on renewing the health of soil, water, biodiversity, and farm resilience. Common practices include no‑till or minimal tillage, year‑round cover crops, crop rotation, agroforestry, composting and integrating livestock. Its overarching goal is to work with natural systems rather than extract from them.

Academic reviews describe it as a holistic, outcome‑based approach that seeks to increase soil organic matter, enhance ecosystem services and even sequester more carbon than conventional agriculture.

Regenerative practices - a quick guide:

• No‑till / minimal tillage

  • Growing crops without ploughing, to protect soil structure and reduce erosion.

• Year‑round cover crops

  • Plants grown to cover soil between harvests, keeping it healthy and preventing erosion.

• Crop rotation

  • Changing the type of crop grown in each field over time to improve soil and reduce pests.

• Agroforestry

  • Growing trees alongside crops or animals to boost biodiversity and soil health.

• Composting

  • Recycling food and plant waste into nutrient-rich material for healthier soil.

• Integrating livestock

  • Letting animals graze on farmland in a way that supports soil and crop health.

Who’s using regenerative agriculture - and where?

• United States - The Rodale Institute championed the term in the 1980s. More recently, the USDA’s Climate‑Smart Commodities programme has invested around US $3 billion in regenerative practices. Major food companies (including PepsiCo, Unilever, Mars) are committing to sourcing from millions of hectares under regenerative methods.

• Europe - The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy now includes eco‑schemes supporting soil conservation and cover cropping. The UK’s Environmental Land Management Scheme offers payments for soil health, biodiversity and agroecological measures.

• Emerging programmes globally - Brazil’s low‑carbon agriculture programme promotes crop‑livestock integration and cover cropping. Canada and Mexico fund regional regenerative initiatives. Projects in Africa are mapping soil carbon and scaling methods across tens of thousands of farms.

Emissions‑saving potential: theory versus reality

• Theoretical carbon sequestration

  • Estimates suggest regenerative cropping systems could remove 14-22 Gt CO₂ per year by 2050 - a substantial share of global emissions. Cover crops and rotations may also boost soil carbon and biodiversity while increasing resilience.

• Practical benefits

  • Trials in the US Corn Belt show enhanced weathering (adding crushed basalt) can sequester ≈15 t CO₂/ha over four years and improve yields. AI‑driven monitoring is helping farmers verify soil carbon gains more accurately.

• Emission reduction estimates

  • Analyses suggest adopting regenerative practices could reduce UK agricultural GHGs by ~4 Mt CO₂e/year by 2040. No‑till alone can reduce nitrous oxide emissions by 40–70 %.

• Real‑world adoption gap

  • Despite the promise, global uptake is patchy and early. Challenges include a lack of standard definitions, fragmented monitoring systems, limited farmer training and upfront costs.

Are policies helping or hindering?

• Inconsistent frameworks

  • Eco‑schemes under CAP and ELMS offer incentives for soil‑friendly practices, but funding is often limited and application is complex.

• Lack of agreed definition

  • Regenerative agriculture remains a loosely defined concept. This lack of clarity enables greenwashing and complicates certification.

• Soil‑carbon credits

  • Voluntary markets (such as Agreena in the UK) are emerging and may help fund adoption. But sceptics worry about measurement reliability and long‑term value.

• Farmer barriers

  • Transition requires deep cultural change, new skills and investment. Many farmers are proceeding incrementally rather than wholesale conversion.

• Positive pilots

  • Partnerships involving governments, NGOs and corporations (e.g. in Denmark or the OP2B private‑public fund) show that clarity, support and targets can help scale adoption.

Bottom line: policy can be a powerful enabler - but so far remains inconsistent, under‑funded and hard to navigate.

"Policy can be a powerful enabler - but so far remains inconsistent, under‑funded and hard to navigate"

Final reflections

Regenerative agriculture holds real potential to sequester carbon, enhance biodiversity and build resilience. But implementation today remains limited by institutional, technical and financial gaps. To unlock its benefits at scale we need:

1. A clear, widely accepted definition and standards

2. Affordable and accurate monitoring systems

3. Incentives and income streams that reward ecosystem outcomes

4. Practical support programmes to aid farmers in making the shift

Up next in the series: Post 2 - Farming on a Changing Planet, where we’ll look at how climate upheaval is reshaping agriculture - and how regenerative methods may fit into farmer adaptation strategies.

Get in touch

Share with visitors how they can contact you and encourage them to ask any questions they may have.